Case study · field template
Case study · Regional narrow-body carrier (anonymised).
The field template a Volgarde teammate fills in after each signature — every section is a local placeholder; the next published case study duplicates this format.
Anonymised client profile
Fleet and aircraft types
Narrow-body fleet operating on a dense regional network — short cycles, day rotations, EGT and vibration monitored tail by tail.
Detected anomaly scenario
Slow EGT-signature drift on a subset of airframes, invisible to fixed-threshold alarms — flagging late in the rotation window.
Agents and sensors deployed
Loop "propulsion vigilance + FAA / EASA calibration" activated fleet-wide: telemetry + radar ingestion, models calibrated over 10 weeks.
Detection timeline
Detection 15-20 days before the incident on two consecutive airframes — signed alert returned to the scheduled-maintenance team.
Avoided downtime estimate
Avoided downtime hours
~120 h
MTTR reduced
-28 %
Predictive alerts fired
07 / quarter
ROI figures
Downtime savings (conservative est.)
320-540 k€ / yr
MRO efficiency
+11 %
Alert → action latency
< 24 h
Before / After metrics
The field template fills in after each Volgarde signature. Here is a representative example — the values are editorial placeholders.
Avoided downtime hours
~0 h documented
~120 h / quarter
MTTR
Baseline score (variable)
-28 % vs. baseline
Alert → action latency
≥ 72 h (fixed threshold)
< 24 h (signed agent alert)
Leadership quote
"Volgarde saw the drift before our alarms — we could plan the hangar and the parts without grounding the aircraft."
Technical stack deployed
- AWS · on-prem outposts
- Telemetry + radar fusion
- Maximo · SAP PM adapters
- Signed FDM / QAR connectors
- Continuous FAA / EASA alignment
Study another fleet?
This template stays editorial — the live dynamic list lives at /etudes-de-cas.
Case study index →Case study · CTA
Map Volgarde onto your fleet.
A Volgarde mission architect walks the agentic loop with you on your fleet — same format, same template.